Ever wonder why scientific information is so hard to understand? Shouldn’t it be available for everyone regardless of their status, credentials or expertise? Science Defined was founded on the notion that science should be freely accessible.Still in the Storm is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
I’d like to see science in the hands and minds of every day folk. Casting their adult wise eyes over their schooled daze eduction and weeding out the fraud from the facts.
Our science and medicine has been intentionally corrupted with deceptions too retard us.
This is what I’ve found, what will you find?
I have a new take on lung and blood physiology that dismisses the gaseous exchange of oxygen and carbon dioxide.
My article is titled
We breathe air not oxygen
Air is measured by its humidity
Oxygen is measured by its dryness for example medical oxygen has 67ppm of water contamination
Oxygen toxicity is directly related to its dryness and ability to dehydrate.
Lungs at the alveoli requires the air to reach 100% humidity. Can you see the mismatch?
The RBCs are carrying salt water, they are salt water sponges.
The red light monitoring is checking hydration
Dark RBCs are dehydrated
Light RBCs are hydrated
The lungs rehydrate the RBCs
Just as the ubiquitous saline drip rehydrates RBCs.
I hope you take the time to read my article and ponder.
Science is the new religion (Scientism) as you make very clear in this post. Yesterday, I published a Stack about what can be done to survive the crisis we all are faced with in 2023. Since the Plandemic, government science is to be trusted over faith in God. We're seeing religion becoming the enemy of the state and government policy being the scripture we should live by. What can we do to prevent this from happening and cope with what's happening to the fundamentals of Americanism.
This might be dumb or obvious, and maybe easily answered here....
Dr Kaufman has been preaching about reading the methods section but I often can't even find this. Perhaps its just behind a pay wall? But it also seems like there are different "types" of published "studies" (and if thats the case, maybe they dont all fall under the "study" term). What i mean by this is that I've seen publications that just seem to consist of like a couple paragraphs.... or there is only an Abstract and nothing more.... surely that can't be all there is here? The title will be something that indicates there should be more substance there, but then it sometimes looks like just commentary? That can't be right - can it?
I guess what I'm saying is maybe you could discuss the different "types" of publications one might encounter. Whether they are behind a pay wall - are there certain kinds that fall in this category? Are there ways around the pay wall or certain publications or websites that are free? Just getting a better understanding of HOW the "studies" (or other categories of scientific papers) are categorized and classified, and the best places to find them would be really helpful i think overall to get us started. And any other basics that may be relevant to this question.
This is great! We should also have data transparency laws at the federal, state, and local level so anyone can access the database without being forced to comply with the narrative being pushed by those profiting from it.
I’d like to see science in the hands and minds of every day folk. Casting their adult wise eyes over their schooled daze eduction and weeding out the fraud from the facts.
Our science and medicine has been intentionally corrupted with deceptions too retard us.
This is what I’ve found, what will you find?
I have a new take on lung and blood physiology that dismisses the gaseous exchange of oxygen and carbon dioxide.
My article is titled
We breathe air not oxygen
Air is measured by its humidity
Oxygen is measured by its dryness for example medical oxygen has 67ppm of water contamination
Oxygen toxicity is directly related to its dryness and ability to dehydrate.
Lungs at the alveoli requires the air to reach 100% humidity. Can you see the mismatch?
The RBCs are carrying salt water, they are salt water sponges.
The red light monitoring is checking hydration
Dark RBCs are dehydrated
Light RBCs are hydrated
The lungs rehydrate the RBCs
Just as the ubiquitous saline drip rehydrates RBCs.
I hope you take the time to read my article and ponder.
Scrutiny is the way back to truth.
https://open.substack.com/pub/jane333/p/we-breath-air-not-oxygen?r=ykfsh&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Science is the new religion (Scientism) as you make very clear in this post. Yesterday, I published a Stack about what can be done to survive the crisis we all are faced with in 2023. Since the Plandemic, government science is to be trusted over faith in God. We're seeing religion becoming the enemy of the state and government policy being the scripture we should live by. What can we do to prevent this from happening and cope with what's happening to the fundamentals of Americanism.
https://open.substack.com/pub/james23444/p/whats-the-biggest-challenge-the-world?r=1v80x0&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
This might be dumb or obvious, and maybe easily answered here....
Dr Kaufman has been preaching about reading the methods section but I often can't even find this. Perhaps its just behind a pay wall? But it also seems like there are different "types" of published "studies" (and if thats the case, maybe they dont all fall under the "study" term). What i mean by this is that I've seen publications that just seem to consist of like a couple paragraphs.... or there is only an Abstract and nothing more.... surely that can't be all there is here? The title will be something that indicates there should be more substance there, but then it sometimes looks like just commentary? That can't be right - can it?
I guess what I'm saying is maybe you could discuss the different "types" of publications one might encounter. Whether they are behind a pay wall - are there certain kinds that fall in this category? Are there ways around the pay wall or certain publications or websites that are free? Just getting a better understanding of HOW the "studies" (or other categories of scientific papers) are categorized and classified, and the best places to find them would be really helpful i think overall to get us started. And any other basics that may be relevant to this question.
This is great! We should also have data transparency laws at the federal, state, and local level so anyone can access the database without being forced to comply with the narrative being pushed by those profiting from it.
Science is already so freely available that it is being adopted by those who know nothing more about it than its popular appeal.